Woakes, perhaps even more uncannily handsome now he’s silvering, has the ball.
England v India: second men’s cricket Test, day one – live | England v India 2025
Published: 2025-07-02 11:02:42 | Views: 10
Key events
Righto, it’s time.
Our players are out, and proceedings will begin with a moment of siilence to remember Wayne Larkins; it turns into a moment of applause when Ben Stokes begins clapping. Well batted, Ned.
And there’s more! “The TMS overseas link is here,” says Andrew Benton. “To get there, go to the BBC cricket page, click the live coverage button and it’s linked in the left box on that page. Always, every day there’s a Test match, easy to find.”
As Milo Minderbender said, “Everyone has a share.”
The OBO cooperative bids you a good morning, courtesy of Andrew Goudie. “Would you like today’s TMS overseas link?” he asks.
Enjoy!
Email! “Best bowling from an Englishman,” begins Shaun. “May I respectfully add Stuart Broad’s 8-15 v Australia? Lots of great spells over the years but this one will always stand out for me. Couldn’t believe what I was watching at the time.”
It surely can’t be only me who, when asked the time when it’s 8.15, will say it’s Stuart Broad, where previously I'd answer “it’s 8.15 and that’s the time that it’s always been.” As it goes, though, I wasn’t talking about spells – Broad has always been the best at those - rather the highest level I’ve seen an English bowler hit was Flintoff at his peak.
Part of me wonders if India are trying to not lose this Test, opting for a long batting line-up while sneaking in a rest for Bumrah, in order to go hard at Lord’s. Other hand, it may be they’re simply trying to address their lack of lower-order runs, which makes sense, it’s not unclear how they plan to take 20 wickets while leaving enough time to score more than England.
Aha, the Champo blog is up and away. Join Tanya for even more love and joy.
What do we think about England’s attack, then? I’m cautiously optimistic in that I think they’re all good bowlers, but for the side to hit a level, at least one of them and ideally two will have to develop into a champion. The batting, on the other hand, looks like it might be there or close to it.
India would also have bowled, and make three changes: in come Nitish Reddy, Washington Sundar and Akash Deep; out go Sai Sudharson – harshly – Thardul Shakur – less so – and Jasprit Bumrah. They thought about playing Bumrah but feel there’ll be more for him in the pitch at Lord’s so leave out the world’s best bowler after a week off – I dunno, maybe it’s be, but are you serious? – and were tempted to pick Kuldeep, but in the end opted to strengthen the batting. Finally, he says “This year has been a year of chaos. A lot of teams who haven’t won a lot have won, so maybe that’ll change fortunes for us.”
Gosh, he doesn’t sound like he fancies his team all that much.
England did well in the last Test so, though you always consider everyone, they are unchanged. When “Bazball with brains” is put to Stokes as a way of describing, he laughs, saying him, Baz and brains are not three words you usually hear together.
England win the toss and bowl
Decent overhead conditions are cited as the reason.
It’s toss time…
I enjoyed reminiscing to myself when reading Ali’s piece, and agree Stokes has far exceeded Flintoff, partly because of his World Cup exploits but mainly because this thing of ours, nearly 150 years enriching humanity, is, on account of his contribution, changed for the better. And yet there’s a part of me saying but the best bowling I’ve ever seen from an Englishman? Flintoff’s.
Also going on:
Sky have Ian Ward interviewing Ben Duckett, who notes that with a newborn at home, you’re quickly back to reality after cricketing heroism. He also notes that at Headingley, the bat just felt great in his hands, and the team have changed as a group, setting a new way of making sure to win. We can see that in how they played Bumrah, and he notes his dismissal in the third Test in New Zealand, when he was out charging Tim Southeee as one of few regrets he has in cricket. Had England finished day four of the first match 10-2, they’d have had very little chance of a successful chase, but they were sensible, reaping their rewards later on.
India also have a choice to make with their bowlers. They’ll presumably leave out Shsrdul Thakur, but do they bolster the tail by replacing him with Washington Sundar, or attack with Kuldeep Yadav – goodness me, they’d have appreciated having him on day five at Headingley.
The sense from DK and SJ is that Jasprit Bumrah won’t be playing. Neither quite gets it – the teams have had a week off and India are trailing – and Broad doesn’t understand why they announced he’d play three of five, instead of taking each “week” as it comes. For my part, I thought they’d pick him here then leave him out at Lord’s, much as they’d want him there, then pick him for OT and see where the series is after four Tests. We shall see.
It looks a pretty pleasant day in Birmingham, which is a relief – I woke up, saw what London was doing, and feared for our plans. But here we are; this is going to be great.
Preamble
“It’s called a Test for a reason” is one of Test cricket’s most enduring cliches. Generally speaking, though, its deployment references the sporting aspect: what happens out there in the middle.
But the reality is somewhat different. Though the game remains testing, an extended examination of will and skill, for those with requisite ability and mentality the more significant test is abandoning friends, family and life for months at a time and year after year – while also being expected to perform.
As such, and though there were other operative factors, it is not entirely surprising that, on recent tours to India and Pakistan, England won the first Test of the series before losing the others. Similarly, in the most recent Ashes, Australia won the first two then lost the second two, and when South Africa last visited, they won the first before being clattered in the second and third.
Or, in other words, it’s hard not to fear for India. Of course there’s the playing aspect – a young team and a novice captain, coming to terms with the retirements of three champions, facing hosts who may just be maturing from something special into something serious. We know, though, that they can play – and they proved it at Headingley, a match it should have been impossible for them to lose. Yet lose it they did, meaning they arrive at Edgbaston trailing 1-0 with four matches still to go. It may not be a long way back, but it is a long way home.
Play: 11am BST
Source link
